Trump’s Triumphal Arch: A Monument to Regulatory Evasion

The proposed 250-foot arch on the Arlington Memorial Bridge, part of Donald Trump’s ambitious projects in Washington D.C., has raised concerns among preservationists and lawmakers. The issue is not just about the arch itself but also the effort by a federal agency packed with Trump appointees to circumvent long-standing regulations that govern historic preservation.

The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) is considering revisions to Section 106, a requirement that has been in place since 1966 to ensure that federal agencies take into account the impact of their projects on historic properties. The proposal would grant federal agencies broader discretion over preservation reviews and prioritize mitigation over avoiding harm to historic places.

This move comes at a time when Trump is pushing for expedited construction of his arch, with an estimated $100 million price tag and a projected completion date of two to three years. Seven out of 24 council members were appointed by the president himself, highlighting the influence of Trump’s allies on the decision-making process.

The implications of this move are far-reaching and troubling. If approved, the revisions to Section 106 would not only speed up the construction of Trump’s arch but also set a precedent for future projects that seek to bypass federal regulations. This is about ensuring that public funds are used responsibly and in accordance with established guidelines.

Historically, efforts to circumvent regulations have led to costly mistakes and unintended consequences. The Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool renovation, rushed through without proper consideration, resulted in a murky, algae-infested mess that reflected poorly on the administration’s commitment to preserving America’s cultural treasures.

The White House has dismissed concerns as “misinformation,” claiming they would follow all legal requirements in constructing the arch. However, this move is part of a broader pattern of regulatory evasion by the Trump administration, which has shown disdain for established procedures and guidelines.

Public opinion is firmly against the construction of Trump’s arch, with only 21% of Americans supporting the project and 52% opposed, according to a recent Washington Post/ABC News/Ipsos poll. This opposition reflects recognition of the importance of preserving America’s cultural heritage for future generations.

If approved, these revisions would embolden future administrations to circumvent regulations at will, with disastrous consequences for our nation’s cultural treasures. The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has a responsibility to uphold the principles of Section 106 and protect America’s historic landmarks from those who seek to exploit them for personal gain.

As the fate of Trump’s arch hangs in the balance, it is clear that this is not just about building a monument; it’s about preserving the very foundations of our democracy.